5000s Arrive
#182
Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:41 PM
Scionic, on 13 January 2010 - 10:11 AM, said:
Definitely closer to DC than NYC.
#184
Posted 15 January 2010 - 10:19 AM
Mr.cta85, on 15 January 2010 - 10:13 AM, said:
When I saw them the other day, they were normal size. When I was coming up the stairs, I initially thought it was a 3200 series until I saw the destination sign, by that time the train was starting to pull out of the station.
#185
Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:08 AM
artthouwill, on 15 January 2010 - 11:19 AM, said:
Oh thats cool are they end caps still blue?
#186
Posted 17 January 2010 - 10:59 AM
They look weird from a distance. At a glance (it was my first time seeing the 5000s in person), it looked like the motor ventilation intakes next to the doors had moved, or the vents were the same color as the skin of the train, or something. It looked like there was solid metal where the vent used to be.
#187
Posted 19 January 2010 - 08:31 AM
Scionic, on 17 January 2010 - 10:59 AM, said:
They look weird from a distance. At a glance (it was my first time seeing the 5000s in person), it looked like the motor ventilation intakes next to the doors had moved, or the vents were the same color as the skin of the train, or something. It looked like there was solid metal where the vent used to be.
Yesterday I saw a six car 5000 series train at Harlem on the Green Line. The electronic destination sign said Cottage Grove. There were no blue end caps on any of the cars. The next Green Line train was also a Cottage Grove train and I wound up taking the following Ashland/63 train. When we crossed Tower 18 junction, I noticed a 5000 series train entering the Merchandise Mart station on the Brown Line tracks, but we passed too quickly for me to read the electronic destination sign. Therefore I could not tell if that was another 5000 series test train, or if that was the same test train I saw being routed around the Loop clockwise returning back to Skokie via the Brown and Red or Purple Line tracks.
It seems to me the best way to test these trains would be to test them "live" and to test them during rush hour. They can gage customer reaction (especially to the longitudinal seating), test the actual reliability of the electronic signage in real use, and the signaling when in close proximity to other trains. I remember the 3200s being tested live and also "mixed in" with the 2600s (I know 5000s can't train with any other series).
#188
Posted 19 January 2010 - 09:30 AM
artthouwill, on 19 January 2010 - 08:31 AM, said:
It seems like the last thing CTA is concerned about is customer reaction, especially to the seating arrangement. Why else would they have settled for doing the 3200 test car decor?
With the "fraidy cat" way this testing is progressing, you can also bet that the last place they will do a test is with actual customers on a rush hour train. If, for instance, there is a signaling error, such as of the type reported when chopper control was rejected on the ten or so 2400s on which it was tested, you would never hear the end of reports that a couple of brand new, $1.4 million apiece cars were just wrecked. I don't know if the testers have gotten over the fear of stalling in the Howard interlocking, yet. There might be some rush hour testing on the signs and the like, but not with passengers until the testers get more confidence.
#189
Posted 19 January 2010 - 06:12 PM
Busjack, on 19 January 2010 - 09:30 AM, said:
With the "fraidy cat" way this testing is progressing, you can also bet that the last place they will do a test is with actual customers on a rush hour train. If, for instance, there is a signaling error, such as of the type reported when chopper control was rejected on the ten or so 2400s on which it was tested, you would never hear the end of reports that a couple of brand new, $1.4 million apiece cars were just wrecked. I don't know if the testers have gotten over the fear of stalling in the Howard interlocking, yet. There might be some rush hour testing on the signs and the like, but not with passengers until the testers get more confidence.
How likely are the new cars to stall in the Howard yard? Is this a common occurance with the other series of cars?
#190
Posted 19 January 2010 - 07:35 PM
Busjack, on 19 January 2010 - 10:30 AM, said:
With the "fraidy cat" way this testing is progressing, you can also bet that the last place they will do a test is with actual customers on a rush hour train. If, for instance, there is a signaling error, such as of the type reported when chopper control was rejected on the ten or so 2400s on which it was tested, you would never hear the end of reports that a couple of brand new, $1.4 million apiece cars were just wrecked. I don't know if the testers have gotten over the fear of stalling in the Howard interlocking, yet. There might be some rush hour testing on the signs and the like, but not with passengers until the testers get more confidence.
Do you think the 5000 will be put in regular service by the summer time? Or should I ask how soon will they be in service??
#191
Posted 02 February 2010 - 02:51 PM

A few observations...
- It was just as loud as any other train...I was really hoping the new cars would be a lot quieter, like they are in NYC and San Francisco.
- An unused train REALLY looks weird -- I'm not used to seeing the outer part of an L train look so clean!
- All the trains had not only the digital destination signs that said "Not In Service," but also pieces of paper in at least one window in each car on both sides of the train that said something like "Test Train - No Passengers."
- There's no destination sign in the front or rear of a car. This makes me think they'll probably be the old-fashioned roller.
#194
Posted 17 February 2010 - 07:14 PM
#195
Posted 17 February 2010 - 07:38 PM
Mr.cta85, on 17 February 2010 - 07:14 PM, said:
I also suppose that if there is a breakdown on a 2200, a 3000-315? that got a full rehab in about 2002 could push it better than a 2400 could.
#196
Posted 18 February 2010 - 05:20 PM
Busjack, on 17 February 2010 - 07:38 PM, said:
I also suppose that if there is a breakdown on a 2200, a 3000-315? that got a full rehab in about 2002 could push it better than a 2400 could.
Or us nostalgia buffs might be happy bringing those #2400's back to where they were on the blue line in the early 80's and late 70's.
#197
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:20 AM
BusHunter, on 18 February 2010 - 05:20 PM, said:
You can have those awful 2400s. The only thing I like about them (and the 2200s for that matter) is that the front seats nearest the opposite side of the operator face forward. You get a great view of signals and can watch other trains ahead. The 2600s and the 3200s and more than likely the 5000s are not so, whereas your back would be to the window and unless you turn your body around to see, you won't.
#199
Posted 11 March 2010 - 12:54 PM
Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply
MultiQuote
